I didn’t say that going above the RDA was unsafe. I agree they are not the maximum your body could tolerate but ingesting the maximum tolerated levels is stressful to the body. What I said was that our bodies work best when such vitamins/minerals are at an optimum level/dose without going above what your body can use.
Was anybody disagreeing?
I haven’t been able to find anywhere that said that. Can you cite your source?
You were talking about one severe medical condition and one nutrient, B12 and pernicious anemia. I was saying that nutrient malabsorption due to AEDs is not that severe and is more broad. Unlike in pernicious anemia, your body is able to absorb nutrients, but it just doesn't get enough. Giving it a little more nutrition seems like a reasonable action to me. I didn't know I needed a scientific citation to advocate something so self evident.
Actually, people
do eat other parts of the plant. For that reason I’d be very careful that there is not roots, bark or flowers when buying a supplement. Here’s an example of just one site that tells people to
eat those.
https://www.naturallybetterclinics.com/the-mystery-of-moringa/
As you pointed out, these parts of the plant other than leaves and pods are made into *medicine*. This is not the same thing as people *eating* them.
The supplements I was describing are clearly labeled as Moringa LEAF powder and capsules. The leaves can be harvested over and over like mowing grass very inexpensively. Nobody is going to slip some of the other parts into your capsules as filler. People making medicines will pay top dollar for the roots, bark, and flowers because those require a mature tree.
I never said it didn’t have vitamins, I pointed out that your link said it was not a proven cure for a long list maladies.
I said that up front. Multivitamins are not a proven cure for anything either but it still might be a good idea to take one.
I understand what the "appeal to antiquity fallacy" is and I don't appreciate the condescending lecture on logic.
The only appeal to antiquity that I was making is that Moringa couldn't possibly be as dangerous as you claim or large parts of the Asian and African continents would be unpopulated by now.
I’m a bit confused. You say there is lots of “very good scientifically valid information” but then you say that it will never meet the standard of western medicine- which is all based on scientifically valid information. This makes no sense to me. I am aware of some very preliminary studies but being so preliminary they shouldn’t be given too much weight yet. To be “very good” it must have been tested in a double-blind study & have the results duplicated by an unassociated lab.
This is my point exactly. You only understand and accept as valid one definition of "scientific".
By the way, they have done studies on spinach for
ATP formation,
Serum antioxidant capacity , and numerous other things. As for Moringa, they have analyzed it and yes…. It does have vitamins & minerals but from what I can tell, as of yet all studies are either in vitro or in rats/mice.
Thanks for the tests on spinach! I notice you didn't post any of what you found on Moringa.
The thing is the parts of the world where they do gold standard tests are also the parts of the world where spinach is common and moringa is exotic. We don't have that kind of lab here on Molokai, but if you would like to come over and fund one....
BTW, Moringa has way better nutrient stats than spinach.