Hi everybody,
I am going to my new neurologist next week and I just need some help before I go.
What happened was I began to have seizures back two years ago. I continued to have them for many months and I was referred to an epilepsy unit for 3 weeks of continuous video eeg monitoring. In the end the doctor said over my first three days I had abnormal epileptic-type activity and abnormal non-epileptic type activity. Although my seizures happened not during these periods and was deemed pseudo-seizures.
I was later diagnosed with Celiac Disease. My doctors think this was the cause, but the internet says Celiac can only cause epileptic seizures, not pseudo-seizures. Either way, my question is this:
1. Should I bring in the papers showing the abnormalities over the first three days to show the neurologist, or is it normal for people to have abnormalities and since I didn't have a seizure at those moments, it should be ok to leave it.
Thanks a lot for your help!!!
I am going to my new neurologist next week and I just need some help before I go.
What happened was I began to have seizures back two years ago. I continued to have them for many months and I was referred to an epilepsy unit for 3 weeks of continuous video eeg monitoring. In the end the doctor said over my first three days I had abnormal epileptic-type activity and abnormal non-epileptic type activity. Although my seizures happened not during these periods and was deemed pseudo-seizures.
I was later diagnosed with Celiac Disease. My doctors think this was the cause, but the internet says Celiac can only cause epileptic seizures, not pseudo-seizures. Either way, my question is this:
1. Should I bring in the papers showing the abnormalities over the first three days to show the neurologist, or is it normal for people to have abnormalities and since I didn't have a seizure at those moments, it should be ok to leave it.
Thanks a lot for your help!!!