Int. Jrnl. of Soc. of Agr. & Food, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 31–49
ISSn: 0798-1759 this journal is blind refereed.
Abstract. A major conflict is developing in science over transgenic foods. Food,
feed, and fiber products derived from transgenic agricultural crops are presented
here as a different case from industrial and pharmaceutical crop transgenics and
should be parsed from the larger transgenics industry for comprehensive re-evaluation
and market roll-back. Reviewed is the development of the crop transgenics
industry; the early influence of the biotechnology industry over the US federal regulatory
agencies in the context of the development of minimal regulation; the basic
technology of plant transgenics; the main transgenic crops, traits, and producing
countries; consumer resistance to transgenic foods; industry problems with shrinking
investments; the worldwide promotion of transgenic crops; and ecological
issues of transgenic crops. Flaws in the one gene–one protein model, the foundation
of transgenics, are reviewed in the context of the recent and ongoing
restructuring of the science of genetics. Research on the mutational consequences
of plant transgenics and its phenotypic ramifications such as allergens and novel
proteins is discussed. Major research findings and ‘red flag’ incidents in the history
of transgenic foods and feeds are reviewed that reflect the flaws in the genetic
foundations of transgenics.
Conclusion:
the hasty transition of the radically new technology of crop transgenics from the research and development stage to commercialization, in which products of the
young industry have permeated global food markets, has resulted in what may turn
out to be the largest diet experiment in history. this problem is limited to transgenic
foods and should not affect bacterial and pharmaceutical crop transgenics, with the
proviso that pharmaceutical crops be grown in enclosures which prevent pollen
escape and be transported and stored in systems which do not transport or store food
grains at any time.
The lack of oversight that has led to the transgenic foods situation has been a major
failure of US’s science leadership. this paper has reviewed the major points in the
history of these failures, from allowing biotechnology industry domination of US federal
regulatory bodies overseeing transgenic products, to a lack of response to ‘red
flag’ incidents and research findings on transgenic crops and foods, to failure to adequately analyze and characterize the genetic and phenotypic integrity of transgenic
products. Part 2 of this paper reviews the major factors in the failure of science to
oversee transgenics, and discusses the agro-ecological alternative to transgenics as a
foundation for building world food security, on top of which can rest non-transgenic
biotechnologies and tried-and-true Green revolution methods.