tinasmom
New
- Messages
- 638
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I just went to pick up Nicole's prescription for Lamictal and they tried to switch it to a generic. They told me that the insurance company was denying the Brand name. I then told them that there is an order from the doctor on file that states Brand Name only Medically Necessary. They then told me that it has to be renewed every year. I told them that she has been getting this prescription for 2 years now with no problem. When I told them that the State Law does not require the doctor to renew this every year, they argued with me. I have looked up the law and this is how it reads:
450.13 Using drug product equivalent in dispensing
prescriptions. (1) DRUG PRODUCT OR EQUIVALENT TO BE USED.
Except as provided in sub. (2), a pharmacist shall dispense every
prescription using either the drug product prescribed or its drug
product equivalent, if its drug product equivalent is lower in price
to the consumer than the drug product prescribed, and shall inform
the consumer of the options available in dispensing the prescription.
In this section, “drug product equivalent” means a drug product
that is designated the therapeutic equivalent of another drug
product by the federal food and drug administration.
(2) EXCEPTION. A prescriber may indicate, by writing on the
face of the prescription order or, with respect to a prescription
order transmitted electronically, by designating in electronic format
the phrase “No substitutions” or words of similar meaning or
the initials “N.S.”, that no substitution of the drug product prescribed
may be made under sub. (1). If such indication is made,
the pharmacist shall dispense the prescription with the specific
drug product prescribed. No preprinted statement regarding drug
product substitution may appear on the face of the prescription
order.
I will be supplying a copy of this statute to the pharmacy and my insurance company. I guess they will find out that they just upset the wrong person.
450.13 Using drug product equivalent in dispensing
prescriptions. (1) DRUG PRODUCT OR EQUIVALENT TO BE USED.
Except as provided in sub. (2), a pharmacist shall dispense every
prescription using either the drug product prescribed or its drug
product equivalent, if its drug product equivalent is lower in price
to the consumer than the drug product prescribed, and shall inform
the consumer of the options available in dispensing the prescription.
In this section, “drug product equivalent” means a drug product
that is designated the therapeutic equivalent of another drug
product by the federal food and drug administration.
(2) EXCEPTION. A prescriber may indicate, by writing on the
face of the prescription order or, with respect to a prescription
order transmitted electronically, by designating in electronic format
the phrase “No substitutions” or words of similar meaning or
the initials “N.S.”, that no substitution of the drug product prescribed
may be made under sub. (1). If such indication is made,
the pharmacist shall dispense the prescription with the specific
drug product prescribed. No preprinted statement regarding drug
product substitution may appear on the face of the prescription
order.
I will be supplying a copy of this statute to the pharmacy and my insurance company. I guess they will find out that they just upset the wrong person.