Scans aren't they confusing

Welcome to the Coping With Epilepsy Forums

Welcome to the Coping With Epilepsy forums - a peer support community for folks dealing (directly or indirectly) with seizure disorders. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.

Please have a look around and if you like what you see, please consider registering an account and joining the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no ads, access to members only (ie. private) forum nodes and more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!

carpediem

New
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Hi all, like most of you I am sure we have all been for scans at some point looking for whats causing our epilepsy. Had a bit of strange one when I was first diagnosed with epilepsy I was sent for the EEG and a number of scans and apperently they came back showing two small calcification on the brain, my neurologists at the time assured me that was what was most likely causing my epilepsy ok, as the years went on and the meds were being changed and sorted every time I had a tonic clonic I was sent to hospital had an EEG and was sent for more lovely scans again always the same thing two small calcifications on the brain most likely the cause of my epilepsy. Now more recently I was sent for an MRI scan they didn't manage to pick anything up the current neurologist said that this may be that faulty equipment was to blame in my home country ( I feel this is unlikely since these scans were done at three seperate hospitals over a number of years) or that the calcifications were just to small to pick up but she doesn't feel they are causing my epilepsy. This pretty much goes against what every other neurologist has told me. So my question here have any of you had similiar experiences and should I go for another scan and if so what sort CT or MRI?
A bit long winded but I really want this to be put to bed either there is a focal point or there isn't, I am confused as all hell.
thanks.
 
How weird? I would assume the first neuros were right, especially like you said, because the scans were done at 3 separate hospitals and at different times, and they all returned the same answer. Is it possible the calcification could have dissolved?
 
Possibly since this scan has been done many years after the last, but that would then mean no focal point right bugger. Oh well, chewing over whether or not I should fork out for a private scan and trying to figure out which one if any I should go for.
 
I'd trust the astronomer's results from a radio telescope over the biologist's results from a visible-light telescope regarding results on how close the asteroid will be to slamming directly into earth
if you catch my drift
but that's what your conundrum sounds like
neurologists are trained specifically for this
 
Back
Top Bottom