I've written and presented on epilepsy, but it's in an academic arena so there is a very specific and narrow audience. My recent publication (in academia) is on stigma that graduate students face and how graduate students can (or cannot) disclose. However, I have also written on the history of epilepsy, which I really enjoy writing on. I've talked with neurologists and also patients about epilepsy, but again I tend to come at it from an ethos of not only being an epileptic, but also a scholar so I maintain a certain jargon when I talk.
I think first and foremost you should consider your audience. I tell my undergrads this. Who would you write this to you? Would you write this for a notable magazine, a distinguished journal, an online blog, etc.? Your audience determines the framework of the piece. If it will be published by the magazine
Epilepsy, which is often seen by everyone from epileptics to caregivers to neurologists, you will want to be concise, but maintain a certain amount of pathos (the rhetoric of "overcoming," while problematic, is often popular). If you're writing for an online blog, you could take a different approach. The digital space really rose up in the 2000's (I believe?) against the militant cancer rhetoric of overcoming to say, "hey, this sucks and we hate it!" Digital spaces are powerful spaces to discuss medication, grief, resistance, etc. Consider a blog post about medication or diagnosis. If you're going with narrative, consider a thread or vein, which can bleed into each other. I think your audience would really enjoy that approach and it would highlight various things about epilepsy that "able-bodied" individuals don't generally think about like how difficult medications can be to take, to obtain, etc.
Lastly, disability studies scholar Simi Linton says in her book
Claiming Disability that while passing (meaning not coming out) certainly holds its own anxieties, coming out likewise carries weight and apprehension that we sometimes don't think about. Coming out allows a person to forge boundaries and establish a location in a community, however coming out also requires a tremendous amount of responsibility and vulnerability. In
Gender Trouble, Judith Butler says that when one comes out of the closet, it is a continuous becoming meaning every day, every moment one comes out. So, if we apply this to coming out as epileptic (or disabled or what have you), one then has to navigate this newly forged terrain that is newly "colonized," which that in itself is problematic. So! Passing or coming out is not a strict binary, rather it is contingent on spaces, a spectrum, and a literal becoming. I think you should do what is safest for you! If you're audience is the World Wide Web, consider writing on something less personal than your seizures-- perhaps you could write on medication, epilepsy and access to healthcare, lack of female neurologists, etc. This brings attention to the disorder itself, but it does not necessarily "out" you completely. It's a "becoming" so to speak.
