I am still really new to the world of epilepsy so please excuse any ignorance I display. As I have mentioned elsewhere, I have a 10-month-old son who has been having seizures since he was a few days old. His seizures only take place when he is asleep. Otherwise, he is perfectly normal while awake. He wakes up right after having a seizure and immediately starts playing and generally does not appear to be disoriented or confused. His development is also normal. This has led me to wonder if he really needs to be treated with medication (he is currently on phenobarbital). Although he is taking medication, his seizures are not fully controlled. The doctor has been pretty admant that we should get the seizures under control so that my son is not affected down the road. This almost certainly means more medication and perhaps introducing different types of medication as well. I feel hesitant as I hate the thought of taking a perfectly normal functioning child and medicating him to the point where he will start to experience side-effects, especially any long-term side-effects that affect his ability to learn.
On the flip side, I have a 17-year-old son who has probably had epilepsy for years but was not diagnosed until recently. The doctor believes this could have been the cause of his OCD, which suddenly became apparent to us earlier this year. The OCD has been devastating to my son and to our family, and I only wish I had known about the epilepsy earlier so we could have treated him and possibly averted the crisis he is currently in.
I know I am rambling away here, but I am just wondering if it is ever appropriate to NOT treat epilepsy with medication? How would you know or make such a decision? Besides OCD, what are some possible consequences of not treating epilepsy? Although I have made the decision to continue treating my infant, I feel like I need more information to help me feel that I am making the right choice for him.
Sorry if this is confusing, but perhaps it will help others who are faced with similar decisions.
On the flip side, I have a 17-year-old son who has probably had epilepsy for years but was not diagnosed until recently. The doctor believes this could have been the cause of his OCD, which suddenly became apparent to us earlier this year. The OCD has been devastating to my son and to our family, and I only wish I had known about the epilepsy earlier so we could have treated him and possibly averted the crisis he is currently in.
I know I am rambling away here, but I am just wondering if it is ever appropriate to NOT treat epilepsy with medication? How would you know or make such a decision? Besides OCD, what are some possible consequences of not treating epilepsy? Although I have made the decision to continue treating my infant, I feel like I need more information to help me feel that I am making the right choice for him.
Sorry if this is confusing, but perhaps it will help others who are faced with similar decisions.