Endless
Even Keel
- Messages
- 4,466
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 0
Those that have been reading my posts for awhile know that I've been considering going off meds completely. I'm sensitive to drugs and have had intolerable side effects (deep untreatable depression, allergic rashes, untolerable impairments to my thinking ability, etc.) on all that I've tried in the past. I'm currently on Lamictal and I don't know how I feel about it yet.
I don't know if anybody else has considered stopping their meds. Nobody is recommending it. Especially the doctors. But if you've toyed with the idea like I have you may find this interesting.
The doctors and the studies agree that treating until a person is seizure free for a number of years (at least two) is the best way to get to seizure remission. That said, what about just chucking the meds altogether, before seizure remission?
One study is particularly hopeful. It studied unmedicated vs. medicated people and how many achieve siezure remission. But it didn't study the effect of initially being on meds then discontinuing before seizure remission. It makes me wonder if being on meds in the first place could make a difference for better or worse in the success of future seizure remission? (haven't found an answer to that yet)
http://0069ec0.netsolhost.com/pdfs/...ed epilepsy - revisiting temporal aspects.pdf
This paper is not so hopeful for people who are untreated:
http://www.comtecmed.com/CONY/2008/Uploads/assets/speakers abstracts/beghi 1.pdf
I found this study that shows a formula with a score on whether or not medication should be discontinued. You have to remember your high school math to do it. My score said I shouldn't stop.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00662.x/full
This is why they usually don't treat people who have had just one seizure:
http://www.aesnet.org/files/dmFile/epc_209.pdf
At least there's a little beacon of hope that if I stopped the meds I might have seizure remission someday. But I guess the odds are in favor of the return of seizures and possible escallation. Feels like a throw of the dice in Vegas.
I don't know if anybody else has considered stopping their meds. Nobody is recommending it. Especially the doctors. But if you've toyed with the idea like I have you may find this interesting.
The doctors and the studies agree that treating until a person is seizure free for a number of years (at least two) is the best way to get to seizure remission. That said, what about just chucking the meds altogether, before seizure remission?
One study is particularly hopeful. It studied unmedicated vs. medicated people and how many achieve siezure remission. But it didn't study the effect of initially being on meds then discontinuing before seizure remission. It makes me wonder if being on meds in the first place could make a difference for better or worse in the success of future seizure remission? (haven't found an answer to that yet)
http://0069ec0.netsolhost.com/pdfs/...ed epilepsy - revisiting temporal aspects.pdf
This paper is not so hopeful for people who are untreated:
http://www.comtecmed.com/CONY/2008/Uploads/assets/speakers abstracts/beghi 1.pdf
I found this study that shows a formula with a score on whether or not medication should be discontinued. You have to remember your high school math to do it. My score said I shouldn't stop.

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00662.x/full
This is why they usually don't treat people who have had just one seizure:
http://www.aesnet.org/files/dmFile/epc_209.pdf
At least there's a little beacon of hope that if I stopped the meds I might have seizure remission someday. But I guess the odds are in favor of the return of seizures and possible escallation. Feels like a throw of the dice in Vegas.