I have yet to find a solid answer to this question. I was on 120mg of phenobarb for ~16 years - from the time I was 6.5 till I became pregnant with my first son, who is now 5.5 yrs old. At that point I read how horrible it was for babies and weaned myself off it - I'd not had a seizure since my first tonic-clonic which put me in a coma for weeks when I was 6.5. And I was fine - my son was born perfect and healthy in every way. I breastfed him for ~3yrs - my second son was born when he was 2.5yrs old and I was fine and he was (is) fine. Then, just shy of 2 yrs ago now, I had my first seizure (tonic-clonic) in 20 yrs - this is !~January 2011.
Since then I've seen 3 different neurologists the first two of whom treated me like an idiot and wouldn't explain themselves to me - they told me phenobarb was horrible, and I was to be on 3000mg of Keppra. I hate the stuff. It makes me feel horrible and angry and semi-drunk and just... horrible. So, for the last ~yr I've taken 1000mg at night and been (mostly) OK, as long as I remember to take it. I just saw a 3rd neuro a couple weeks ago, and he's having me try Lamictal now - I'm currently on 50mg of Lamictal +1000mg of Keppra, till I get up to 100mg of Lamictal and then ween off the Keppra. I like him much better than the last two - he's actually been willing to listen to me and talk to me somewhat. But he was no more willing than anyone else to even discuss phenobarbitol!!
I just don't understand it - phenobarb worked fine for me for ~16 years. I never had any of the nasty side effects relating to mood or feeling drunk or anything. I realize its bad for my liver and bones and what not, but from what I can tell none of these drugs are actually 'good' for you. And what I *do* know is that Keppra & Lamictal are expensive as heck and that we *DONT* know what long-term side effects really are, cause' they're too new!!
So... yeah. Do any of you know whats so horrible about phenobarb? Why is it treated as all but a non-option today? What is so much better about Keppra, Lamictal, etc??
Since then I've seen 3 different neurologists the first two of whom treated me like an idiot and wouldn't explain themselves to me - they told me phenobarb was horrible, and I was to be on 3000mg of Keppra. I hate the stuff. It makes me feel horrible and angry and semi-drunk and just... horrible. So, for the last ~yr I've taken 1000mg at night and been (mostly) OK, as long as I remember to take it. I just saw a 3rd neuro a couple weeks ago, and he's having me try Lamictal now - I'm currently on 50mg of Lamictal +1000mg of Keppra, till I get up to 100mg of Lamictal and then ween off the Keppra. I like him much better than the last two - he's actually been willing to listen to me and talk to me somewhat. But he was no more willing than anyone else to even discuss phenobarbitol!!
I just don't understand it - phenobarb worked fine for me for ~16 years. I never had any of the nasty side effects relating to mood or feeling drunk or anything. I realize its bad for my liver and bones and what not, but from what I can tell none of these drugs are actually 'good' for you. And what I *do* know is that Keppra & Lamictal are expensive as heck and that we *DONT* know what long-term side effects really are, cause' they're too new!!
So... yeah. Do any of you know whats so horrible about phenobarb? Why is it treated as all but a non-option today? What is so much better about Keppra, Lamictal, etc??