I really need some help from you guys right now. This is my story short: years ago I started having different seizures. I was examined thoroughly (only because of one type of seizure because I didn't tell anyone about the others) but eeg, ct and whatever else I had came back clear and there wasn't really done anything else. I was sent home again and it was all forgotten... Except I kept having the seizures. Back to the now:
Recently my husband and I talked about driver's licens. I don't have one because of the seizures. I have a new doc now and she was much more understanding than the old one so I told her about the other seizures and said she that by the description she thought it was epilepsy. I went to see a neuro who only had the information about me that scans and eeg were clear. He seemed to have decided already it wasn't epilepsy before I came and he didn't listen much. Then he said it wasn't epilepsy but still I had to take eeg again to be sure. Well, the eeg wasn't clear this time, there was something. Now we're getting somewhere. :clap:
Then the neuro listened to us and suddenly he was absolute positive it was epilepsy even though we said the very same things last time we talked! Still he mentioned pnes - in case an mri came back clear?! Does an mri really have to show something?
onder:
Next thing that happens is the mri is clear and then my phone rings. I fail to take it, call back the number and it is the neuro's secretairy. She informs me that the neuro don't know what is wrong with me why I have to go to a hospital for further examinations... Can he decide?!
I'm now waiting for a letter from that hospital. Very confused. Don't know if it is epilepsy or not and really just thought it was enough that the eeg showed something. Appearently it isn't? If it is not epilepsy what else can it be then that looks like and shows signs of epilepsy on an eeg?
Good day to you,
Mellismom
Recently my husband and I talked about driver's licens. I don't have one because of the seizures. I have a new doc now and she was much more understanding than the old one so I told her about the other seizures and said she that by the description she thought it was epilepsy. I went to see a neuro who only had the information about me that scans and eeg were clear. He seemed to have decided already it wasn't epilepsy before I came and he didn't listen much. Then he said it wasn't epilepsy but still I had to take eeg again to be sure. Well, the eeg wasn't clear this time, there was something. Now we're getting somewhere. :clap:
Then the neuro listened to us and suddenly he was absolute positive it was epilepsy even though we said the very same things last time we talked! Still he mentioned pnes - in case an mri came back clear?! Does an mri really have to show something?

Next thing that happens is the mri is clear and then my phone rings. I fail to take it, call back the number and it is the neuro's secretairy. She informs me that the neuro don't know what is wrong with me why I have to go to a hospital for further examinations... Can he decide?!
I'm now waiting for a letter from that hospital. Very confused. Don't know if it is epilepsy or not and really just thought it was enough that the eeg showed something. Appearently it isn't? If it is not epilepsy what else can it be then that looks like and shows signs of epilepsy on an eeg?
Good day to you,
Mellismom