http://my.epilepsy.com/newsletter/o...ail&utm_term=0_cf0feb6500-6de39bb67c-12030341
So what is everyone's opinion of this?
I think all of the sudden everyone in the early stages of seizure diagnosis or not yet diagnosed are suddenly going to question whether their seizures are "real" or not, and maybe not go through with getting a proper diagnosis. No one wants epilepsy, but at the same time I think no wants to be told they have a psychological problem. For these reasons, I want to bring the article to the forefront so it can be discussed, and anyone with questions can throw them out to the knowledgeable members of this forum.
For me:
-if the seizure wakes me: often my eyes will CLOSE because they become extremely painful and sensitive even when it is dark. Strike one.
-my seizures are largely left-sided so movements are asymmetrical or asynchronous (my left arm curls to my head, my head turns and stays turned to the left and my left leg does a sustained kick to the left, while my right arm does a sustained extension out to the right Strike two.
-I can recall some of the event most of the time. Strike three.
-I am exhausted after the event and the next day, but I wouldn't call myself confused exactly. Unless I'm taking too strong an interpretation to the meaning of confused. Strike 4.
(I haven't had a vEEG yet, but standard one hour EEGs normal).
Hey, strike 4; I was probably already "out" at strike 2 or 3.
Based on history, MRI and event descriptions the epileptologist feels frontal lobe epilepsy. While I realize the article is probably a summary, it doesn't even mention the importance of MRI, event descriptions, and history. I was on a rant to my sympathetic best friend about my employer being upset today about my taking too many days off due to seizures, and then when I got home today I got chewed out by my sister-in-law about something else not my fault so I guess I'm on a roll or something
Anyway, I would like to hear what others feel about this article.
So what is everyone's opinion of this?
I think all of the sudden everyone in the early stages of seizure diagnosis or not yet diagnosed are suddenly going to question whether their seizures are "real" or not, and maybe not go through with getting a proper diagnosis. No one wants epilepsy, but at the same time I think no wants to be told they have a psychological problem. For these reasons, I want to bring the article to the forefront so it can be discussed, and anyone with questions can throw them out to the knowledgeable members of this forum.
For me:
-if the seizure wakes me: often my eyes will CLOSE because they become extremely painful and sensitive even when it is dark. Strike one.
-my seizures are largely left-sided so movements are asymmetrical or asynchronous (my left arm curls to my head, my head turns and stays turned to the left and my left leg does a sustained kick to the left, while my right arm does a sustained extension out to the right Strike two.
-I can recall some of the event most of the time. Strike three.
-I am exhausted after the event and the next day, but I wouldn't call myself confused exactly. Unless I'm taking too strong an interpretation to the meaning of confused. Strike 4.
(I haven't had a vEEG yet, but standard one hour EEGs normal).
Hey, strike 4; I was probably already "out" at strike 2 or 3.
Based on history, MRI and event descriptions the epileptologist feels frontal lobe epilepsy. While I realize the article is probably a summary, it doesn't even mention the importance of MRI, event descriptions, and history. I was on a rant to my sympathetic best friend about my employer being upset today about my taking too many days off due to seizures, and then when I got home today I got chewed out by my sister-in-law about something else not my fault so I guess I'm on a roll or something

Last edited: