Welcome to the Coping With Epilepsy forums - a peer support community for folks dealing (directly or indirectly) with seizure disorders. You can visit the forum page to see the list of forum nodes (categories/rooms) for topics.
Please have a look around and if you like what you see, please consider registering an account and joining the discussions. When you register an account and log in, you may enjoy additional benefits including no ads, access to members only (ie. private) forum nodes and more. Registering an account is free - you have nothing to lose!
Some supplements may make certain antiseizure medications less effective. Ask your doctor before taking any herbs or supplements.
Taurine is an amino acid that may be involved in the brain's electrical activity and is often low in people with seizures. It acts like GABA (gamma aminobutyric acid, 500 mg, 2 times per day), another amino acid that is often low in people with seizures. But there is no scientific evidence that taking either supplement will reduce seizures. Taurine may interact with many medications. Do not take taurine of GABA supplements without your doctor's supervision. Do not take taurine or GABA if you have a history of bipolar disorder, or if you take psychoactive medications.
Biosynthesis
Taurine is a derived from cysteine, the amino acid that contains a thiol group. Mammalian taurine synthesis occurs in the pancreas via the cysteine sulfinic acid pathway. In this pathway, the thiol group of cysteine is first oxidized to cysteine sulfinic acid by the enzyme cysteine dioxygenase. Cysteine sulfinic acid, in turn, is decarboxylated by sulfinoalanine decarboxylase to form hypotaurine. Hypotaurine is enzymatically oxidized to yield taurine by hypotaurine dehydrogenase
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfinoalanine_decarboxylaseThis enzyme participates in taurine and hypotaurine metabolism. It employs one cofactor, pyridoxal phosphate.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cofactor_(biochemistry)Organic cofactors are often vitamins or are made from vitamins.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megavitamin_therapyMegavitamin therapy is typically used in alternative medicine by practitioners who call their approach "orthomolecular medicine", but also used in mainstream medicine for "exceedingly rare" genetic conditions that respond to megadoses of vitamins.
bad nights sleeping are the primary driver for me. I am an insomniac and have been since i was about 21/22.
seizures started at 25. bi polar about 20.
Blonde A, i just got back from a 8 day stay at the mayo clinic, fire away with ?'s if you would like.
I am about 32 (5wks away) so i know i am a bit different from your situation, but for me, Mayo was a huge learning experience. I didnt come away with any direct improvement, but a ton of knowledge.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taurine
sulfinoalanine decarboxylase:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfinoalanine_decarboxylase
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cofactor_(biochemistry)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megavitamin_therapy
**DO NOT ALTER ANY MEDICATION WITHOUT YOPUR DOCTOR'S CONSENT**
Yes Andrew
Diagnostic Orthomolecular Medicine (DOM) works by interconnecting the information from disparate scientific disciplines and explains the mechanisms that drive biochemistry from normal to abnormal .
Orthomolecular therapies have been criticized as lacking a sufficient evidence base for clinical use: their scientific foundations are too weak, the studies that have been performed are too few and too open to interpretation, and reported positive findings in observational studies are contradicted by the results of more rigorous clinical trials.[52][58] Accordingly, "there is no evidence that orthomolecular medicine is effective". Proponents of orthomolecular medicine strongly dispute this statement by citing studies demonstrating the effectiveness of treatments involving vitamins, though this ignores the belief that a normal diet will provide adequate nutrients to avoid deficiencies, and that orthomolecular treatments are not actually related to vitamin deficiency.[10] The lack of scientifically rigorous testing of orthomolecular medicine has led to its practices being classed with other forms of alternative medicine and regarded as unscientific.[59][60][61] It has been described as food faddism and quackery, with critics arguing that it is based upon an "exaggerated belief in the effects of nutrition upon health and disease."[62][63][64] Orthomolecular practitioners will often use dubious diagnostic methods to define what substances are "correct"; one example is hair analysis, which produces spurious results when used in this fashion.[10]
I don't understand what you're talking about (sorry). What process is pushing what our of range of what?Hi Epileric
The DOM approach aims to analyse what process is pushing things out of range.
Don’t you see Dr. Igor Tabrizian? I know you have an appreciation for him but I would be very scared to go to a doctor who was implicated in someones death because they didn’t provided proper medical treatment.I see a Dr who completed medical school in the University of Western Australia in 1982 and worked in hospital medicine in Oz and abroad for 14 yrs before venturing into a combined private practice of general and anaesthetics. He has an interest in biochemistry and consequently his Nutritional Medicine practice is based on applied biochemistry.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/learn-from-this-tragedy/story-e6frfhqf-1225881062712Cancer surgeon Cameron Platell told the coroner that even at this late stage she had "a good chance of survival" if she'd agreed to surgery, but she kept putting off an operation, trusting instead to Scrayen's homoeopathy and the "nutritional supplements" she was prescribed by a Dr Igor Tabrizian.
I’m sure many people who use the test will use the claim that it’s not liked by doctors because patients can order it themselves but if you seriously check it out, you’ll see that they probably don’t like it because its’ not been shown to be accurate.HTMSA (Hair Tissue Mineral Analysis) was introduced over 50yrs ago, the test has continue to cause controversy. Perhaps the most annoying aspect (to medical drs who are used to controlling a patients investigations), is that the patients can order these on their own accord? The Dr I see was most sceptical on HTMA back in 1999, however, over time he has positive perspective of the place of HTMS in medical practice.
http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/hair.htmlProponents claim that hair analysis is useful for evaluating a person's general state of nutrition and health and is valuable in detecting predisposition to disease. They also claim that hair analysis enables a doctor to determine if mineral deficiency, mineral imbalance, or heavy metal pollutants in the body may be the cause of a patient's symptoms. These claims are false.
• Hair analysis is not reliable for evaluating the nutritional status of individuals. In 1974, the AMA Committee on Cutaneous Health and Cosmetics noted: "The state of health of the body may be entirely unrelated to the physical and chemical condition of the hair . . . Although severe deficiency states of an essential element are often associated with low concentrations of the element in hair, there are no data that indicate that low concentrations of an element signify low tissue levels nor that high concentrations reflect high tissue stores. Therefore . . . hair metal levels would rarely help a physician select effective treatment." [3]
• Most commercial hair analysis laboratories have not validated their analytical techniques by checking them against standard reference materials. The techniques typically used to prepare samples for analysis can introduce errors for many of the elements being determined.
• Hair mineral content can be affected by exposure to various substances such as shampoos, bleaches and hair dyes. No analytic technique enables reliable determination of the source of specific levels of elements in hair as bodily or environmental.
• The level of certain minerals can be affected by the color, diameter and rate of growth of an individual's hair, the season of the year, the geographic location, and the age and gender of the individual.
• Normal ranges of hair minerals have not been defined.
• For most elements, no correlation has been established between hair level and other known indicators of nutrition status. It is possible for hair concentration of an element (zinc, for example) to be high even though deficiency exists in the body.
• Hair grows slowly (1 cm/month), so even hair closest to the scalp is several weeks old and thus may not reflect current body conditions for purposes of health diagnosis.
• The use of a single multielemental hair analysis test as the sole means of diagnosis violates basic tenets of medical practice that laboratory findings should be considered together with the patient's history and physical examination, and that the practitioner should keep in mind that laboratory errors occur.
It is a mistake to assume that because something has been around for a long time that it must be good. Remember bloodletting was done for thousands of years and we now know that it doesn't purge peoples humors.HTMA has been around for 50 plus yrs. If not useful, then why would we keep doing the test?
Medical Drs may be quick to discount anecdotal stories. Some love to quote the SINGLE (anecdotal ) study published by the JAMA (Journal of Medical Association) when the same hair sample was sent to like five different American labs(none of which had accreditation to perform such tests by the way) and of course the results were different!
I’m sorry but I don’t understand how telling me about how 2 contradicting results taken within minutes can show any validity. I would tend to think that it shows how random & inaccurate the test is. I'd be curious how the doctor decided which result was "normal".Over the yrs, the Dr I see for my girl has seen several patients who )(by quirk of fate) had their blood samples (for electrolytes , cholesterol) analysed twice within minutes of each other by the same machine and guess what?? The results were different! Sometimes the difference was flagged as abnormal in one sample run, but normal in the other.
Don’t assume that writing a book automatically gives a persons’ claims validity. There have been books written on how the earth is flat yet I don’t think writing a book about it makes it true. http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/home/index.php/flat-earth-library/library-books For that matter, one of the main red flags that people use to identify quacks is when they take their claims to the media or book publisher rather than publishing it in a medical journal for peer review.So
Id rather see someone that publishes books on the matter.